How the West is winning on home prices: Clear Capital

REAL ESTATE
How the West is winning on home prices: Clear Capital
By Jessica Huseman

• July 10, 2012 • 8:14am

Quarterly home values in June improved nationally, continuing a positive trend from the spring. National prices rebounded with quarterly and yearly gains of 1.7%, according to Clear Capital, which forecast continued growth through the remainder of the year.

National home prices picked up notable momentum over last month’s marginal gains of 0.1%, the Trukee, Calif.-based data and valuation company said. It predicted additional growth of 2.5% forecasted through the end of the year.

“June home price trends provided further evidence that housing has turned the corner, with the momentum of the recovery picking up speed,” said  Alex Villacorta, director of research and analytics at Clear Capital.

Clear Capital uses a rolling quarter measure, which compares the most recent four months to the previous three months. The rolling quarters have no fixed start date and can be used to generate indices as data flows in to reduce multimonth lag time.

The West came in with the highest gains, showing quarter-over-quarter growth of 3.5% — an increase of 0.8% over May and annual price gains of 4.1%. Clear Capital expects the trend to continue through 2012 with an additional 5.75% growth over the next two quarters.

While the recovery generally began in the lower-priced segments, growth spread across all price tiers in the West, which the report calls an “important step in the progression of this recovery.”

In the quarter, low-tier gains in the West hit 3.6% (sales less than $140,000), mid-tier gains reached 3.1% (homes selling between $140,000 and $347,000) and top-tier gains climbed to 3.2%. This led the West to push ahead of the South, the next closest region, by 2%.

The South continued to grow in June, pushing up 1.5% over the rolling quarter, slightly above May’s 1.2% gain.

The Midwest saw the largest increase over last month in quarterly home prices, rising 1.2% compared to May’s quarterly losses of 2%. It was the only region not posting year-over-year gains, with a loss of 0.6%.

Home prices in the Northeast rose 2.3% over the last year. The South experienced a smaller price hike of 1.5% over the last year and during the quarter, an improvement over the annual growth of 0.9% shown in last month’s report.

The top 50 metro markets also posted gains in June, with the large majority of markets seeing quarterly gains and only seven seeing slides. Of those markets that posted losses, only four saw declines larger than 1%.

The report indicates more good news out of Phoenix, which has been showing consistent signs of strength for the past 10 months. Clear Capital reported quarterly growth of 8.7% in Phoenix with annual gains of 20.4%.

Seattle, where prices rose 8.4% over the quarter, could see prices rise 14.4% annually once final numbers of 2012 are in, while Phoenix prices could rise by 10.4% annually.

Atlanta is not positioned to do as well. It sustained the largest declines of all the MSAs. However, the anticipated losses of 3.2% seem mild in comparison to Atlanta’s total declines of 53.5% from peak prices in 2006.

jhuseman@housingwire.com
@JessicaHuseman

COURTESY OF YOUR NUMBER ONE ARCADIA REAL ESTATE AGENT

Buffett Extends Real-Estate Bet With ResCap Pursuit: Mortgages

By Noah Buhayar and Dakin Campbell - Jun 18, 2012 11:26 AM PM

Buffett Bets Big on Housing with $3.8B ResCap Bid

Warren Buffett, whose prediction last year of a housing recovery was premature, is raising his bet on a rebound with his $3.85 billion bid for a mortgage business and loan portfolio from bankrupt Residential Capital LLC.

Berkshire Hathaway Chairman Warren Buffett

Berkshire Hathaway Inc. Chairman Warren Buffett. Photographer: Andrew Harrer/Bloomberg

The offer “certainly indicates that he thinks the worst is behind us,” Jeff Matthews, author of “Secrets in Plain Sight: Business & Investing Secrets of Warren Buffett,” said in a phone interview. “Yes, he’s been wrong about housing before. But if you look at any credit metric, if you look at any of the banks and what’s happening in their loan portfolios, it’s getting better.”

Foreclosure filings in the U.S. have fallen on an annual basis for 20 straight months, according to RealtyTrac Inc., and home prices jumped 1.8 percent in March, the biggest monthly increase in at least two decades, as record-low mortgage ratesand a dwindling inventory of properties available for sale strengthened demand.

Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK/A) has prepared for a turnaround by buying a brickmaker, expanding its real estate brokerage and wagering on commercial property through a company jointly owned with Leucadia National Corp. (LUK) The venture, called Berkadia Commercial Mortgage LLC, was formed from a loan- servicing and mortgage business purchased out of bankruptcy in 2009 and once owned by ResCap’s parent.

Berkshire was little changed today at $123,656 as of 2:15 p.m. in New York trading. It’s risen 7.8 percent this year.

Auction Approval

Ally Financial Inc. (ALLY), a Detroit-based auto lender majority owned by U.S. taxpayers, put its ResCap unit into bankruptcy last month to distance itself from the mortgage lenders’ losses and help repay its 2008 bailout following the U.S. housing crash and subsequent credit crisis.

U.S. Bankruptcy Court Judge Martin Glenn is considering approving auctions for the assets at a hearing today in Manhattan. Berkshire said in a June 11 court filing that it’s seeking to replaceFortress Investment Group LLC (FIG)’s Nationstar Mortgage Holdings Inc. as the stalking-horse, or initial, bidder at an auction for ResCap’s mortgage business. Berkshire has also proposed replacing Ally as the first bidder for the lender’s loan portfolio.

The billionaire’s Omaha, Nebraska-based firm, which is a ResCap bondholder, offered to match Fortress’s price of about $2.4 billion for the mortgage operations. It’s also proposing fees that are about $60 million lower than Nationstar’s if it’s outbid. Berkshire said it’s prepared to pay $1.45 billion for the loan portfolio, compared with Ally’s $1.4 billion for a sale outside the bankruptcy plan backed by the car lender.

‘Real Offer’

At the hearing today, Glenn asked ResCap’s lawyers to explain why an affiliate of Fortress deserves to be the lead bidder when Berkshire’s offer has a lower breakup fee. ResCap, Berkshire and Nationstar will return to court later today to argue about who should be named the first bidder for a court- supervised auction of ResCap’s mortgage-servicing unit.

The judge can either accept Nationstar as the stalking horse for the mortgage unit, name Berkshire in its place, or refuse to grant any company the protections, such as the breakup fee, that come with being the initial bidder.

Buffett has “come out with what appears to be a very real offer to buy the assets,” said John McKenna, a managing director at Miller Buckfire & Co., a New York-based financial advisory firm. “The court will ferret out whether it is a tactic or a legitimate interest in acquiring the assets.” A buyer can’t “just show up and feign interest in order to generate a better return.”

Stalking Horse

Nationstar said Berkshire’s request shouldn’t be granted because it may discourage potential investors in future bankruptcies from devoting the time and money required to be a stalking-horse, according to a June 14 court document. Susan Fitzpatrick, a ResCap spokeswoman, Fortress’s Gordon Runte and Ally’s Gina Proia declined to comment. Buffett didn’t respond to a request for comment sent to an assistant.

ResCap rejected Buffett’s offer to be the initial bidder and asked the court to approve the Nationstar and Ally proposal on June 14. Should Glenn approve ResCap’s plan, Berkshire still could bid in the auctions. It wouldn’t have the advantages given to the stalking horse, including any breakup fee.

The court will probably affirm Nationstar as the initial bidder for the mortgage assets, beginning a three-month auction process, Douglas Harter, a Credit Suisse Group AG analyst, wrote in a June 13 note after meeting with the firm’s management. He said he expects other bidders to emerge.

Funding Advantage

Acquiring ResCap’s mortgage business would give Berkshire contracts to service loans, a function Berkadia provides for commercial real-estate investors. It would also give Buffett another platform to originate mortgages, which his firm already does for buyers of its Clayton unit’s pre-fabricated homes.

Berkshire, which holds the second-highest credit rating from Standard & Poor’s, can access funding cheaper than almost any company in the U.S. It sold $750 million of five-year bonds paying a 1.6 percent coupon last month.

ResCap, once among the largest subprime mortgage originators, reduced its assets to $15.7 billion in the first quarter from more than $130 billion in 2006. The firm is the fifth-largest U.S. mortgage servicer, handling the billing and collections on about $369 billion mortgages in the first quarter, according to Inside Mortgage Finance, a trade journal.

Lenders Retreat

Some of the largest home lenders including Bank of America Corp. (BAC) have retreated from servicing and underwriting loans as new international rules designed to avert another financial crisis force banks to raise capital. That’s creating an opportunity for investors like Buffett to scoop up assets at discounted prices and benefit from the rebound in housing, said David Lykken, the managing partner of consultant Mortgage Banking Solutions.

Since the collapse of the housing market, investors have been asking, “When’s the time to catch this falling knife?” he said. If Berkshire wins the auction for the loan portfolio, the firm may be able to increase the assets’ value by modifying some of the mortgages, he said.

Buffett has said the real-estate market will rebound because a growing number of households will need properties while supply has dropped after builders retreated following the collapse. U.S. housing starts have plunged about two-thirds since 2006 and property prices are more than 35 percent below their peak that year.

Market Rebound

“Housing will come back — you can be sure of that,” Buffett wrote in a February letter to Berkshire shareholders. “Every day we are creating more households than housing units. People may postpone hitching up during uncertain times, but eventually hormones take over. And while ‘doubling-up’ may be the initial reaction of some during a recession, living with in- laws can quickly lose its allure.”

Berkshire is the largest investor in Wells Fargo & Co. (WFC), the biggest U.S. home-loan originator, and has a preferred stake in Bank of America, the fourth-largest U.S. mortgage lender. Buffett’s firm also has subsidiaries that make carpet, building insulation and roofing materials. Its subsidiary Acme Brick Co. last year bought Montgomery, Alabama-based Jenkins Brick Co.

The HomeServices of America Inc. unit has struck deals to acquire real-estate brokerages inConnecticutOregon and the state of Washington this year on the expectation that home sales will rebound as banks liquidate seized properties after settling foreclosure-misconduct claims. The housing market is “starting to show a pulse,” HomeServices Chief Executive Officer Ron Peltier said in an April interview.

$1 Offer

Berkshire attempted to buy ResCap for $1 before the bankruptcy last month, the mortgage lender said in a June 14 court document. “Neither ResCap entering into bankruptcy nor a sale of ResCap’s mortgage production platform is in the best interests of Ally, the U.S. Treasury, Berkshire and other significant stakeholders in both Ally and ResCap,” Berkshire said in a May 3 letter, according to the filing.

Buffett’s firm proposed taking on ResCap’s potential liabilities, such as mounting litigation costs, according to three people familiar with the matter who requested anonymity because talks were private. Berkshire wanted to avoid a ResCap bankruptcy because it held unsecured debt, the people said. Ally rejected the proposal after deciding that a bankruptcy filing and sale better protected the company from future liabilities, the people said.

Debt Investments

Buffett’s firm invested in ResCap’s secured and unsecured bonds more than two years ago, according to a June 4 court filing, in which Berkshire called for a probe of the mortgage lender’s pre-bankruptcy deals. Prices for three of ResCap’s unsecured bonds climbed after the document was filed, according to Trace, the bond-price reporting system of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority.

Two days later, Berkshire had sold its unsecured debt, which had a face value of more than $500 million, according to court documents. Berkshire said in a court filing it holds more than $900 million in ResCap’s junior secured bonds. ResCap’s 9.625 percent junior secured notes, which Berkshire’s General Re unit owned as of Dec. 31, added 0.3 cent to 95.3 cents on the dollar at 1:48 p.m. in New York, according to Trace. They’ve risen from 56.9 cents in November.

To contact the reporters on this story: Noah Buhayar in New York at nbuhayar@bloomberg.net; Dakin Campbell in San Francisco at dcampbell27@bloomberg.net

Why Your Bank Wants You to Refinance

Housing

By Karen Weise on June 18, 2012

Nearly 80 percent of all mortgage applications are for refinancing now, according to the Mortgage Bankers Association, a near-record level. Why is the figure so high? Two reasons. First, demand for refinancings is up because homeowners want to take advantage of thehistoric low interest rates to reduce their monthly payments. Second, there are still very few new purchases as the housing market tries to recover. “When rates go down, it doesn’t spur homebuying, it spurs refinancing,” says Guy Cecala, publisher of Inside Mortgage Finance.

The Mortgage Bankers Association says nearly 30 percent of refinancings are part of the federal program HARP 2.0, designed to let borrowers who are current on their mortgages refi even if they owe more than their home is worth. Under HARP 2.0, borrowers don’t have to go through a new application process if they refinance with the bank that already services the mortgage, and if the loan is guaranteed by Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac, explains Cecala.

Lenders have an added incentive to offer refinancings to existing customers—Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac don’t require lenders to vouch for the quality of the new mortgages, making it less likely that the lenders will be forced to buy back soured loans. That incentive has lenders scouring the databases of their customers to find borrowers who are eligible for the program, says Frank Donnelly, president of the Mortgage Bankers Association of Metropolitan Washington.

HARP refinances could lower monthly payments by 26 percent, estimate economists at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. The White House bills refinancing as part of its effort to “heal the housing market.” When HARP 2.0 was announced last fall, the housing data firm CoreLogic explained that the program would have “little direct and immediate benefit” to distressed borrowers and housing markets. Instead, CoreLogic said, the benefit of lowering monthly payments for borrowers is more like an economic stimulus “on the order of several billion dollars.” Of course, the economy can use all the help it can get—whatever form it takes.

Weise is a reporter for Bloomberg Businessweek.

COURTESY OF YOUR NUMBER ONE ARCADIA REAL ESTATE AGENT

Homeowner Aid Boosts Big Banks

By CHRISTIAN BERTHELSEN and ALAN ZIBEL

A government program that helps struggling homeowners take advantage of low interest rates to cut monthly mortgage payments is providing an unexpected revenue boost to large banks such as Wells Fargo WFC +0.43% & Co. and J.P. Morgan ChaseJPM -0.91% & Co.

[refinance]European Pressphoto AgencyHUD Secretary Shaun Donovan says there is ‘essentially a monopoly on refinancings’ among the largest banks.

Banks that collect those payments, known as mortgage servicers, could get as much as $12 billion in revenue this year refinancing mortgages under the federal Home Affordable Refinance Program, or HARP, according to data compiled by Nomura Holdings Inc.

A government program that helps struggling homeowners take advantage of low interest rates to cut monthly mortgage payments is providing an unexpected revenue boost to large banks. Christian Berthelsen has details on The News Hub. Photo: Reuters.

Borrowers who refinance mortgages through HARP, on the other hand, stand to save between $2.5 billion and $5 billion this year, according to an analysis by The Wall Street Journal of Nomura’s figures.

The contrast is the latest illustration of the competing demands policy makers must juggle when they devise responses to the housing bust, now in its sixth year. Federal officials last year revised the HARP program in a bid to encourage banks to refinance borrowers who were current on their payments but owed more than their properties were worth.

The revisions have driven a sharp increase in refinancings, following years in which the program fell short of government projections. But some critics, including members of the Obama administration, say the changes risk making HARP a giveaway to big banks.

[REFINANCE]

That is because the new HARP rules make it easier for borrowers to refinance their loans with existing lenders. That, the critics say, allows large lenders to charge a captive customer base above-market interest rates on the refinanced loans. Borrowers refinancing through their existing lender make up about 75% of HARP refinancings, according to government figures.

“There’s essentially a monopoly on refinancing,” Housing and Urban Development Secretary Shaun Donovan said at a Senate hearing last month. For borrowers, Mr. Donovan said, “Whoever holds their current loan, whoever is the servicer, they can charge them—and we’re seeing this—very high fees.”

The Obama administration and some mortgage-industry participants say this arrangement leaves the lion’s share of refinancing activity with giant banks. Among the biggest beneficiaries: Wells Fargo, which held a third of the market as of March, and J.P. Morgan, with more than 10%, according to Inside Mortgage Finance. U.S. BancorpUSB +0.09% Bank of America Corp.BAC -1.22% and Citigroup Inc. C -2.12% rounded out the top five, which together hold 58% of the market.

Banks have been charging HARP borrowers as much as 0.53 percentage point more than the market rate on the refinanced mortgages, according to Amherst Securities. Officials at the Federal Housing Finance Agency, the independent regulator that runs the program, said the premium is far smaller, around 0.1 percentage point on average, for Fannie Mae borrowers.

A Wells Fargo spokeswoman said the bank’s rates are “competitive with our traditional refinancing loan options.” A J.P. Morgan spokeswoman declined to comment on the rates it is charging borrowers but said “demand from customers has exceeded our expectations.” A Bank of America spokeswoman said, “We offer market-driven pricing for both HARP and traditional refinances.” A spokesman for Citi said the bank is offering market rates. A U.S. Bancorp spokesman couldn’t be reached for comment.

The administration is pressing lawmakers to make it easier for consumers to refinance with different lenders. A senior administration official said the administration tried to get the FHFA to change the policy last year but was unable to do so.

The FHFA, which oversees Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, which finance the lion’s share of home mortgages, defends the program’s structure. Officials there say that any lack of competition is a problem felt in the overall mortgage market, which has shrunk for years with the collapse of many nonbank lenders and the retreat of large banks such as Bank of America, and not a result of HARP.

“We feel very comfortable that lenders are offering borrowers the HARP product at the going market rate,” said Meg Burns, the FHFA’s senior associate director for housing policy.

Wells Fargo Chief Financial Officer Timothy Sloan told analysts in an April 13 conference call that HARP refinancings made up 15% of new mortgages during the first quarter. At J.P. Morgan, Chief Executive James Dimon told analysts on a conference call April 13 that profit margins “were several hundred million [dollars] higher than what we would call normal for a whole bunch of different reasons, including HARP” and mortgage-industry dynamics such as supply and demand.

Banks also can reap gains as the mortgages are securitized and sold, because of reduced risk that borrowers will repay their mortgages early. Margins on the sale of securitized mortgages averaged 2.1 percentage points higher in the first quarter this year than last year among the top five servicers, an analysis of data from investment bank Keefe, Bruyette & Woods shows.

The original HARP, rolled out in 2009, blocked borrowers from refinancing if they owed more than 125% of their home’s value. Fewer than 900,000 borrowers had used the program when President Barack Obama announced changes last fall. The revamped program removed that loan-to-value cap and made other tweaks.

Mortgage rates have hit the lowest levels on record, sinking to an average of 3.71% for a 30-year fixed rate loan last week, according to Freddie Mac.

Nomura analyst Glenn Schorr said in a research note that most borrowers seeking HARP loans are paying interest rates of 5%-6%. Those borrowers, he said, “would certainly prefer a 3.75% mortgage, but they will happily take a 4%, 4.25% or even a 4.5% loan as well.”

COURTESY OF YOUR NUMBER ONE ARCADIA REAL ESTATE AGENT

Mortgage rates keep plunging: 15-year dips below 3%

By Jessica Dickler @CNNMoney May 31, 2012: 12:45 PM ET
mortgage-rates

NEW YORK (CNNMoney) — Mortgage rates continued to plunge to new lows this week, with interest rates on the 15-year fixed rate mortgage dipping below 3% for the first time on record.

The 30-year fixed mortgage, the most popular mortgage product, fell by 0.03 percentage points to 3.75%, setting yet another record for the fifth week in a row, according to a weekly survey by Freddie Mac. Last year, 30-year loans averaged 4.55%. The new low can save borrowers about $47 a month for every $100,000 borrowed. Over a 30-year term, that comes to $16,756.

Rates on the 15-year fixed mortgage, which is popular among those looking to refinance, fell to 2.97% — the first time it has dropped below 3% since Freddie Mac began tracking the weekly data. Down from 3.74% a year ago, the new 15-year rate would lower borrowing costs to $689 a month for every $100,000 borrowed, a $37 savings compared to last year.

The continued slide in mortgage rates is, in part, due to ongoingeconomic turmoil in Europe, according to Freddie Mac’s chief economist, Frank Nothaft.

“Market concerns over tensions in the Eurozone led to a decline in long-term Treasury bond yields helping to bring fixed mortgage rates to new record lows this week,” he said.

Rates are almost half what they were at the peak of the housing bubble in mid-2006. At the time, the average interest rate was about 6.75% for a 30-year loan.

Meanwhile, home prices have hit new post-bubble lows, according to the most recent S&P/Case-Shiller home price index of 20 major markets. Home prices have not been this low since mid-2002.

Much lower home prices, along with affordable mortgages, should help to bolster the housing market, but don’t expect a vigorous recovery to follow, said Mike Larson, a housing market analyst for Weiss Research.

“The less you have to pay for a house the better that is but it’s not a cure all,” he said. “Despite lower interest rates, there is still a weak economy and weak job market. That’s not good for underlying housing demand.”

How to Find Low-Cost Investing Help

Want assistance but only have a small nest egg? You’ve got a number of options.

Getting high-quality investment advice at a reasonable cost might seem like a challenge, particularly for anyone with a modest nest egg.

But if you’re a mutual-fund investor with a smaller portfolio, take heart. Advisory fees have fallen significantly because of competition, changes in the way financial advisers package services and the arrival of low-cost Internet-based money-management services.

Individuals have a much larger range of advisory choices than ever before, says Matt Matrisian, an expert on advisory services at the wealth-management arm of Genworth Financial Inc., GNW -1.91% based in Richmond, Va.

ADVICE

David Pohl

Some advisers will craft a basic financial plan and suggest portfolio allocations for a flat fee of less than $1,000 in an effort to build a relationship with a client. Others might do it free, although you will pay continuing money-management fees.

There are some caveats. If you opt for a low-cost service, you may not have the option of calling someone for reassurance if stocks take a tumble. And as your portfolio grows and your life circumstances change, you probably would benefit from spending more on additional services such as educational, tax or estate planning.

But especially for people who have just started accumulating assets, a basic advisory service may be all you need. Here’s what you need to know about finding advisory services at a cost you can afford:

TRADITIONAL SERVICE

A full-service adviser will try to gauge your tolerance for risk and gather many details about your assets, debts and objectives before designing a portfolio. A really comprehensive financial plan—one that might include estate planning, for example—can cost $2,000 or a lot more.

On top of that, advisers traditionally have charged annual fees of around 1% to 2% of the amount in your portfolio to oversee it. Others get paid by steering investors toward funds that require an upfront sales commission, or “load.”

If you invest in funds—as most people with smaller portfolios do—you also will have to pay the funds’ expenses, which range from less than 0.25% for some index mutual funds and exchange-traded funds to 1% to 2% for some actively managed funds.

All in all, annual money-management fees could cost you around 2% to 3%, a good-sized bite in an era of low interest rates and uncertain equity returns.

HELP ON A BUDGET

Some individual planners and advisers may agree to work at lower fees if they think it will help them forge a long-term relationship with you.

Some may agree to work on an hourly fee basis—$300 an hour is a typical rate—or on a flat-fee-per-project basis.

You can find a financial adviser who might suit your personal needs through websites operated by trade groups such as the Financial Planning Association (fpanet.org), the National Association of Personal Financial Advisors (Napfa.org) or the Alliance of Cambridge Advisors (ACAplanners.org). Another option is Garrett Planning Network (Garrettplanningnetwork.com), a network of fee-only advisers who charge by the hour.

Do some homework before calling a prospective adviser. Pull together your financial data and do some online research to learn about the services advisers offer and what they charge, says Lynn Ballou, a certified financial planner and managing partner of Ballou Plum Wealth Advisors LLC in Lafayette, Calif.

Be straightforward about what you believe you can afford, and don’t apologize for asking for a basic level of service, Ms. Ballou says. “You need to make sure you have the right fit” when hiring an adviser, she says.

MUTUAL-FUND ROUTE

Some mutual-fund firms provide no-frill advisory services to people who invest in their products, although there often is a minimum asset requirement.

For example, investors with portfolios of less than $50,000 can get a basic financial plan and allocation recommendations for a flat fee of $1,000 from fund giant Vanguard Group. That fee falls to $250 for people with at least $50,000 to invest.

USAA, a diversified financial-services firm in San Antonio that focuses mainly on U.S. military families, offers free financial planning and investment advice to anyone via telephone, without any minimum asset requirement, says Mary Stork, an executive in its financial-advice and financial-services group. However, USAA advisers will tailor a portfolio only with the firm’s own mutual funds, and you’ll need to have $250,000 to invest if you want a face-to-face meeting.

DISCOUNT-BROKER OPTION

Discount brokerage firms, which have long served do-it-yourself investors, have started to provide advice and portfolio-management services, too.

People who open an account at discount brokerage Charles Schwab Corp.,SCHW -2.89% for example, can receive a free personal consultation, in person or via phone, and get a financial plan and recommended investment allocations, says Brennan Miller, a Schwab financial consultant based in suburban Chicago.

If you have at least $50,000 to invest, Schwab will create and manage a mutual-fund portfolio for you. The firm charges an annual management fee of 0.50% on the first $250,000 in assets, which covers all transactions and any rebalancing, but not management expenses charged by funds. Schwab also will create and manage a portfolio of ETFs for clients with at least $100,000, for an annual fee that starts at 0.75% of assets.

 

WEB-BASED SERVICES

If you already bank and shop on the Internet, managing your money there might be a natural next step.

Wealthfront.com automates the process of creating a risk profile, recommends a portfolio of ETFs and periodically rebalances it. It requires a minimum of $5,000. Other than expenses charged by the ETFs it uses, it charges no advisory fee on the first $25,000. If you invest more, the fee rises to 0.25% a year.

Wealthfront users won’t speak with a human at the firm unless they encounter a problem that requires technical support.

The service mainly targets young professionals in the tech industry because those “who live their lives on the Web” are likely to be most receptive, says Andy Rachleff, president and chief executive officer. But the service is open to anyone and has attracted others who want to be like those in Silicon Valley, says Mr. Rachleff.

Another online service, Betterment.com, offer personal consultations to people who invest at least $100,000. Those take place with its chief executive officer, Jon Stein, who also is a chartered financial analyst.

Annual fees range from 0.35% for those with less than $10,000 to 0.15% for a portfolio of at least $100,000. There is no required minimum, but the service does ask users, at the least, to commit to arranging a $100 monthly transfer into their Betterment accounts.

Betterment relies on a total of only eight equity and bond ETFs, all from Vanguard orBlackRock Inc.’s BLK -3.07% iShares unit, for varied allocations of its clients.

“By simplifying the solution set, we believe we help people make better decisions,” says Mr. Stein.

Mr. Pollock is a writer in Ridgewood, N.J. Email him at reports@wsj.com.

 

Craig and Susan McCaw List a Private Island for $75 Million

 

Craig and Susan McCaw have listed their 780-acre private island off the coast of Vancouver, B.C., for $75 million. Candace Jackson has details on The News Hub. Photo: Jacob McNeil/PlatinumHD.

Craig and Susan McCaw have listed their 780-acre private island off the coast of Vancouver, British Columbia, for $75 million.

Known as James Island, the property is about a mile off the coast of Vancouver Island and has a private Jack Nicklaus-designed golf course, sandy beaches, an airstrip and a marina. There is a four-bedroom, 5,000-square-foot main residence built from reclaimed cedar, a large warehouse that has been converted into an entertainment center, a gym, a store, staff accommodations and six guest cottages.

[SB10001424052702303640104577438521856489182]

Jacob McNeil/PlatinumHDCraig and Susan McCaw have listed their 780-acre private island off the coast of Vancouver, British Columbia, for $75 million.

Formerly the site of a World War II-era dynamite plant, the island once had a population of roughly 800. In the 1980s it was partially developed into a resort. Mr. McCaw, the cellphone-industry pioneer, purchased the island in 1994.

Mr. McCaw said in an email that his family “adores being on the island” but are selling now because they “have the perfect storm of kids’ activities and no one wants to be left behind.”

Mark Lester of Sotheby’s International Realty in Vancouver has the listing.

A Beverly Hills Estate Goes Back on the Market for $39 Million

A 10.5-acre Beverly Hills, Calif., equestrian estate is back on the market for $39 million, a 30% discount from its most recent asking price of $54.9 million late last year. The property is owned by Bo Zarnegin, who built the Peninsula Hotel in Beverly Hills with his brother Robert.

The large property is on a hilltop off Coldwater Canyon with views of the city and ocean and is zoned for horses, with equestrian facilities including eight stables and offices. The 6,377-square-foot, five-bedroom, five-bath Monterey Colonial-style main house was built in 1939 and was recently restored. There’s also a large guesthouse with two bedrooms, a kitchen and a living room that opens onto an outdoor swimming pool.

The home was previously owned by Warner Bros. Pictures chief John Calley and later, Dawn Steel, who ran Columbia Pictures. Mr. Zarnegin purchased the house seven years ago from Ms. Steel’s estate. Listing broker Barry Peele, of Sotheby’s International Realty in Beverly Hills, says the home is not Mr. Zarnegin’s primary residence. Mr. Peele shares the listing with Robin Greer, also of Sotheby’s.

Lake Tahoe Waterfront Home Lists for $20 Million. The Lake Tahoe, Calif., home of Richard and Mary Lou Johnson has listed for $20 million.

The 4,000-square-foot home has six bedrooms and five baths. It is on 400 feet of lakefront and is adjacent to 350 acres of private meadows and forest. It was designed in 1939 by Julia Morgan, the architect of the Hearst Castle.

The Johnsons purchased the home in 1976. Mr. Johnson, the co-founder of an electronics and semiconductor company, says he’s selling because he and his wife are assembling a financial estate to be left to their children.

Christy Curtis and Dwight McCarthy of Coldwell Banker have the listing.

—Candace Jackson

For Mortgage Lenders, Less is More

The first rule of successful prognostication is never to mention a number and a time in the same sentence.

tape0529

Bloomberg NewsWells Fargo writes one in three U.S. mortgages and saw $2.62 billion in net gains on mortgage originations and sales in the first quarter.

Economists at the Mortgage Bankers Association haven’t taken the easy way out though. With homeowners chasing fresh lows in mortgage rates, last week the trade group increased its estimate for 2012 refinancing activity to $870 billion.

That is $200 billion more than its previous estimate and is more than twice its $400 billion forecast of last summer. Wednesday’s report on weekly refinancing activity is expected to underpin this with a fourth, consecutive rise; activity increased 5.6% last week on a seasonally adjusted, weekly basis.

This year’s torrid refinancing activity is translating into big profits for some banks, but the connection isn’t as direct as it seems. With many borrowers unable to meet stricter lending standards, activity is just half of that seen during the housing boom’s heyday.

[AOT]

But it is more profitable. That is because banks’ “gain on sale” for each mortgage is far higher—a swing of some $3,000 on a typical loan, estimates Guy Cecala of Inside Mortgage Finance. “Since 2008, we’ve had a lack of real competition in the mortgage market,” he says.

Wells Fargo WFC -4.91% & Co. is an example. It writes one in three U.S. mortgages and saw $2.62 billion in net gains on mortgage originations and sales in the first quarter. That was up 127% from a year earlier and equaled a big chunk of its $4.25 billion in first-quarter net income.

The upshot for borrowers is that, while rates are near record lows for those with good credit, they could be even lower.

Chalk that up to banks that see no need to chase customers. And why add capacity now? Just months ago, banks’ own experts were telling them that average rates for 30-year fixed mortgages would be 5% in 2012 and that business volume would be half of today’s level.

For what it is worth, the MBA’s prediction is for a 60% drop next year in refinancing. If it is finally right, it means that banks’ mortgage profits will shrink. But, should it be because rates rise and not just that the pool of eligible refinancing candidates shrinks further, borrowers waiting to pounce on that lower rate shouldn’t dawdle.

Spencer Jakab at spencer.jakab@wsj.com

Home prices lowest since 2002

By Jessica Dickler @CNNMoney May 30, 2012: 3:02 PM ET

Home prices hit new lows.
Home prices hit new post-crisis lows in March.

NEW YORK (CNNMoney) — Home prices hit new post-bubble lows in March, according to a report out Tuesday.

Average home prices were down 2.6% from 12 months earlier, according to the S&P/Case-Shiller home price index of 20 major markets. Home prices have not been this low since mid-2002.

“While there has been improvement in some regions, housing prices have not turned,” said David Blitzer, spokesman for S&P.

Although five cities — Atlanta, Chicago, Las Vegas, New York and Portland — saw average home prices hit new lows, that’s an improvement from last month’s report, in which nine cities notched new lows, Blitzer noted.

In 13 of the 20 cities, average home prices fell in March from the year before. Atlanta fared the worst, with home prices down 17.7% year over year. Home prices in Atlanta, Cleveland, Detroit and Las Vegas are all below their January 2000 levels.

Alternatively, Phoenix posted the largest gain, with prices up 6.1% from last year. Other cities showing an uptick included Dallas, Denver and Miami.

Overall, the 20-city composite is down about 35% from its peak in 2006.

Experts say affordable mortgages, combined with much lower home prices, should help to bolster the housing market.

“It’s probably the best time to buy a home in decades,” said Pat Newport, an analyst for IHS Global Insight.

“But the problem is that unless you have good credit, you are probably going to have trouble qualifying for a loan,” he added, referring to overly tight lending conditions.

Last week, a report by the National Association of Realtors showed thathome sales jumped in April. Sales of new homes were also higher in April, according to a separate government report.

“This might be a strong season, but there’s a good chance we’ll continue down for years still,” said Robert Shiller, professor of economics at Yale University. “There’s too much uncertainty.”

Freddie Mac: 30-year fixed mortgage hits new record low at 3.79%

Mortgage ratesFreddie Mac’s McLean, Va., campus. Rates well under 4% continue for 30-year fixed mortgages (Freddie Mac / May17, 2012)
By E. Scott ReckardMay 17, 2012, 7:26 a.m.

OK, maybe it’s not as jaw-dropping as crashing the 5% or the 4% barrier. But Freddie Mac says 30-year mortgage rates have fallen below 3.8% for the first time to average 3.79%, down from a then-record 3.83% a week ago.

The 15-year fixed loan also hit another new low, falling from 3.05% last week to 3.04% this week in Freddie’s latest survey, released Thursday morning.

The start rates on adjustable mortgages rose slightly in the survey, which asks lenders what rates they are quoting to rock-solid borrowers with 20% down payments or equivalent equity in their homes if they are refinancing.

The borrowers would have paid 0.7% of the loan amount on average in upfront fees and discount points to obtain the fixed-rate loans, and slightly less for adjustable-rate loans.

The low rates have been a gift to people refinancing their home loans, a market also driven recently by a revised government program to help people refinance underwater loans.

A Mortgage Bankers Assn. report this week recorded a double-digit jump in applications for replacement mortgages, which now make up three-quarters of all home loan requests.